Euverlèk gebroeker:Stephan 0796
Bèste Stephan. Alderieës, wilkóm op Wikipedia! Ich zoog des se 'n pagina euver Zeeuwsch-Vlaanderen hads gesjreve. V'r hawwen al 't artikel Ziews-Vlaondere, dus ich höb dees twieë samegeveug zodet gein infermasie verlaore geit. Gr, --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 24 aug 2015 13:31 (CEST)
Limburgish Request
[brón bewèrke]Dear Mr Stephan,
Could you help me translate this text into Limburgish?:
- "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."
I tried to search for a modern Limburgish translation of the Bible but was unable to find one, hence my request. --DaveZ123 (euverlègk) 1 okt 2016 07:11 (CEST)
Thank you
[brón bewèrke]- Thank you so much Mr. Stephan 0796 for your brilliant translation help!
- I am very very Grateful.
- May you be blessed!
- Yours Sincerely, --DaveZ123 (euverlègk) 5 fib 2017 15:50 (CET)
leedjes tekste
[brón bewèrke]Ich how dich al ins gevraog of daste ins ing paar van ming tekste wools bekieke en korrisjere. Wilste mich helpe? Wie kin ich dich die ut beste sture? Geweun knippe en plekke heij?
- Gerre hei! Dan zieë ich 't waal versjiene. --SCV (euverlègk) 19 mrt 2017 22:38 (CET)
g'n
[brón bewèrke]Ha, efkes 'nen tip. 't Lidwaord "g'n" wuuertj zoea verbaoge wie 't ónbepaoldj lidwaord "'n", dus m. "g'ne(n)", v. "g'n" en n. "ge"/"g'n". --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 15 jul 2017 12:10 (CEST)
- Ha OWTB! 't Woar teëge twelf oer sjnachs en ich wool sjnel aafsjlete. Dat is óch typisch 't moment oeë-óp me e bietsjke noalieësig kin zing. :) --SCV (euverlègk) 15 jul 2017 13:03 (CEST)
- Ah jao. Det kan ouch :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 15 jul 2017 13:58 (CEST)
Redireks
[brón bewèrke]Danke veur 't aanmake vanne redireks! Doe moogs dich troewes det werk ouch bespare es 't dich te zieër vermeujtj. V'r höbbe OwtbBot dae 't voel werk veur ós opknap zónger det de Recènte verangeringe vol kómme te staon :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 20 jul 2017 19:36 (CEST)
- Ah, dat wós ich nog neet. Es 't 'n meugeligheed guëf um voel te zieë, woarum neet eh? :) Meh zoog ich dich neet óch redirekte aamake? 't Is e tiedje trük, meh 't woare d'r hiel vöal achteree. Ich gleuf dat 't vuur de pazjena Gooj getal woar. Wie functioneert zoeëne bot? Is 't e automatisch systeem of wirk 't alling wen me ópdrachte sjik? --SCV (euverlègk) 20 jul 2017 23:32 (CEST)
- Jao, aventoe vergaet ich mich oet te logge es Ooswesthoesbes en in te logge es OwtbBot. En soms bön ich neet heim dus den maak ich de gelinkdje redireks gewuuen zoea aan :)
- Ich höb mich e progremmaeke laote make det automatisch lieste kan generere die waere geäöpendj in internet. 't Opslaon geit waal handjmaesig, went den kin ich alles controlere, döks zitj dao namelik ouch kwatsj of foute tösse. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 21 jul 2017 11:37 (CEST)
Verdudelikingspagina
[brón bewèrke]Ha Stephan! Wens se 'n verdudelikingspagina aanmaaks, den kins se-n 'm toeveuge aan de lies op Wikipedia:Verdudelikingspazjena. Dees pagina steit gelink via 't vp-sjebloean, dus det is neet zoväöl meudje :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 23 aug 2017 14:46 (CEST)
- Jup, doa zal ich aa dinke.--SCV (euverlègk) 23 aug 2017 15:54 (CEST)
Vrundsjapsverzeuk Facebook/LinkedIn
[brón bewèrke]Nog e vröagsjke (es ich zoe vrie maag zien): hat gier e Facebook- of LinkedIn-account? V'r kinne eenanger bekans twieë joare; missjien is 't tied vuur 'n digitaal vrundsjap... :) --SCV (euverlègk) 23 aug 2017 15:54 (CEST)
- Ich plaats zelf noeatj links nao Facebook op wiki's, meh doe kans mich gerös 'ne link nao dien profiel dao mit de mail sjikke (Special:Email/Ooswesthoesbes) nao mich :) LinkedIn höb ich nag örges, meh dao doon ich nieks mit. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 24 aug 2017 10:34 (CEST)
In 't Nuujs
[brón bewèrke]Daag Stephan, iech weit neet of 't noe wel zoe good idee is um die nuitsberiechte zoe laank te make. De paasj is zoe al väöls te laank (iech zouw ze ins mote arsjivere), en daobij zien veer gein nuitssite. 't Idee vaan In 't nuujs is veural um de lezer door te verwieze nao aander artikele, e bitteke zoewie en:Portal:Current Events, boe 't oetindelek op gebaseerd is. Es te ech deper wèls ingoon op nuitsfeite, daan dink treuver um 'n artikel aon te make. Hoof neet direk èllelaank te weure, e stumpke is genog. Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 2 okt 2017 18:27 (CEST)
- 't Is ming meneer um zoeë te berichte. Lank is 't zikker; ich ving zulke berichte evvel te kót vuur 'n echte pazjena, meh 't guëf aa g'ne angere kank óch mieë kótte artikele. Dat sjtukske uëver 't referendum in Catalonië kin ich i jieëker geval sameveuge. --SCV (euverlègk) 2 okt 2017 19:35 (CEST)
Straotnaome
[brón bewèrke]Dao höbbe v'r noets get euver aofgesproke, meh dat liek miech vaan wel. Entans, veur straote in 't Limbörgs taolgebeed. Bedink diech mer de twietaolege sjèldsjes dieste in de binnestad vaan Mestreech höbs, 't zouw wel gek zien es v'r de Pletielestraot hei gewoen 'Platielstraat' neumde... Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 15 nov 2017 14:28 (CET)
- In nuuj wieke zeen de name meistes gewuuen litterlik vertaaldj gewaore. Inne stadscentra enne dörpskaenen aevel neet. Zoea zègke v'r in Mofert inne nuuj wieke Gelderwaeg (Gelreweg), Sjoltiswaeg (Scholtisweg), Amb Mofert (Ambt Montfort), Bóswaeg (Bosweg) etc, meh neet inne kaen: Ane Bek (Markt), Oppe Zandj (Zandstraat), Diekke Straot (Dijkstraat), Waterstraot (Aan het Water), Gendoevessteeg (Julianastraat), etc. Det is dus waal get veur euver te wake. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 15 nov 2017 15:32 (CET)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[brón bewèrke]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[brón bewèrke]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[brón bewèrke]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Categorieë
[brón bewèrke]Hoj Stephan, categorie-pagina's verplaotse heet geine zin. De moos de artikele boe ze in stoon bewèrke. Of dat mèt 'ne bot (laote) doen. Steinbach (euverlègk) 31 mei 2018 14:06 (CEST)
- Aoh oké, ich han ginne bot, mar ich zal de artikele waal bewirke. --Stephan (euverlègk) 31 mei 2018 14:19 (CEST)
- Bedank vuur d'r tip. --Stephan (euverlègk) 31 mei 2018 14:20 (CEST)
Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are published
[brón bewèrke]Hello! A few months ago the Wikimedia Foundation invited you to take a survey about your experiences on Wikipedia. You signed up to receive the results. The report is now published on Meta-Wiki! We asked contributors 170 questions across many different topics like diversity, harassment, paid editing, Wikimedia events and many others.
Read the report or watch the presentation, which is available only in English.
Add your thoughts and comments to the report talk page.
Feel free to share the report on Wikipedia/Wikimedia or on your favorite social media. Thanks!
--EGalvez (WMF)
1 okt 2018 21:25 (CEST)
bussje
[brón bewèrke]Haj! :) Waat is de raeje det se "bussje" mit 'n dóbbel s sjriefs? Mich zuut det hieël vraemp oet. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 1 nov 2018 17:47 (CET)
- Hey! Volges 't woadbook is 't mieëvoud van "busj" mit doebel s. Um oet te sjlete, dat 't missjien 'ne typefeëler woar, han ich vergeliekbaar wöad ópgezóch, wie "wusj" (boekèt; mv. "wussje"). --Stephan (euverlègk) 1 nov 2018 22:58 (CET)
- Apaart, mer es 't waordebook 't veursjrief haje v'r ós dao-aan :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 2 nov 2018 10:20 (CET)
Oliver & Company
[brón bewèrke]Hello, I saw you can speak some Esperanto. So, could you translate this information from Esperanto Wikipedia to Limburgs? "La filmo estas inspirita sur la klasika romano de Charles Dickens nome Oliver Twist. Temas pri kaĉjo, Oliver, kiu kunigas grupon da hundoj por postvivi en la stratoj de Nov-Jorko." Also, for Liv and Maddie, I wanted to translate "La serio temas pri identaj ĝemeloj fratinoj" as well. There is more information about these articles, but these are the most important parts I wanted to write. I also wanted to write "Het is de 15e animatiefilm van Disney." on Lady and the Tramp. Thank you. 2602:306:83A9:3D00:1809:163E:3D70:969A 24 jul 2019 00:56 (CEST)
d'r berg
[brón bewèrke][1] - Ich mèndje hie eigentlik "berg" es mieëvaad mit, aangezeen d'n Oeral ouch neet eine berg is, meh mieëdere. Ich geluif det 't den toch "de berg" is, of neet? :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 22 aug 2019 12:00 (CEST)
- Klop, ich woar e bietsjke te sjnel. :) --Stephan (euverlègk) 22 aug 2019 12:09 (CEST)
Neutraliteit betwis
[brón bewèrke]Daag Stephan, ich moot attentiesjablone neet zoe, umtot ze op ziech niks oplosse. Iech vin tot me zoeget beter op de euverlèkpaasj kin bespreke. Hei is dat al gans 't geval: 't sjabloon zeet nog niks euver wat iemes noe neet-neutraol aon 't artikel vint. Um korter bij 'n oplossing te koume, moot me toch minstens zègke wat traon mankeert - of wienie me zeker vaan zien zaak is, gewoen zelf 't artikel aonpasse. Kinste us op Euverlèk: Platdiets en Plattdütsch dao get euver kwiet? Steinbach (euverlègk) 22 mrt 2020 17:23 (CET)
- Jao, eigelik höbs se waal geliek. 't Zuutj neet ech zoea oetnuuejendj oet. Waat waal is, is det döks get op 'n euverlègkpaasj wuuert neergezatj en daonao nieks daomit gebeurt. 't Is waal henjig es v'r teminste örges 'n euverzich höbbe van pagina's wobie de neutraliteit neet in orde is. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 22 mrt 2020 19:09 (CET)
- Daag Steinbach en OWTB, volges dit artikel is Wikipedia neet de plaatsj um persuënlige uëvertuginge te verkóndige. Sommige dele van 't artikel Platdiets en Plattdütsch zint inderdaad erg ónencyclopedisch gesjrieëve. Hei bringk d'r gebroeker hieël dudelig zing mening noa vure, dewiel 't zjüs wichtig is um objectief te blieve. Mit zoeën sjabloon kins te dit probleem op z'n mins zinjalere. 'ch Zouw 't sjabloon kanne aapasse, zoeëdat me i maximaal twieë of drei wöad kan aageëve, wat d'raa mankeert. --Stephan (euverlègk) 22 mrt 2020 19:48 (CET)
- Hoj Stephan, iech bin 't compleet mèt diech ins en iech wis ouch eigelek wel totste dat meindes. Veur miech maag dat gans artikel wel weure eweggepläörd. Oonder us gezag: mèt Mergelsberg, die 't heet aongemaak, gaof 't wel dèkser neutraliteitsprobleme. Meh daan nog vin iech tot zoeget op de euverlègkpaasj moot weure besproke. Zoe vaan: dit en dit en dit vin iech neet good aon 't artikel, wat tunks uuch / wie goon v'r dit oplosse? Steinbach (euverlègk) 23 mrt 2020 22:24 (CET)
- Es Stephan 't artikel wiltj ómgoeaje haet t'r miene zaenge; anges doon ich 't waal inne loup vannen tied. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 24 mrt 2020 08:08 (CET)
- Doa zoot ich sowieso aan te dinke. Ing alinea mót waal genóg zing um oet te legke dat 't Platduutsj gewuën 'ne term is deë binne de Vlamsje dialectologie weëd gebroek, zoeëwie 't volges mich óch sjteet óp de Nederlandse Wikipedia. Óp 't moment wirk 'ch aa ming scriptie, mar 'ch zal mich 'ne blik d'róp werpe went ich mieë tied han. :) -Stephan (euverlègk) 24 mrt 2020 14:58 (CET)
- Es Stephan 't artikel wiltj ómgoeaje haet t'r miene zaenge; anges doon ich 't waal inne loup vannen tied. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 24 mrt 2020 08:08 (CET)
- Hoj Stephan, iech bin 't compleet mèt diech ins en iech wis ouch eigelek wel totste dat meindes. Veur miech maag dat gans artikel wel weure eweggepläörd. Oonder us gezag: mèt Mergelsberg, die 't heet aongemaak, gaof 't wel dèkser neutraliteitsprobleme. Meh daan nog vin iech tot zoeget op de euverlègkpaasj moot weure besproke. Zoe vaan: dit en dit en dit vin iech neet good aon 't artikel, wat tunks uuch / wie goon v'r dit oplosse? Steinbach (euverlègk) 23 mrt 2020 22:24 (CET)
- Daag Steinbach en OWTB, volges dit artikel is Wikipedia neet de plaatsj um persuënlige uëvertuginge te verkóndige. Sommige dele van 't artikel Platdiets en Plattdütsch zint inderdaad erg ónencyclopedisch gesjrieëve. Hei bringk d'r gebroeker hieël dudelig zing mening noa vure, dewiel 't zjüs wichtig is um objectief te blieve. Mit zoeën sjabloon kins te dit probleem op z'n mins zinjalere. 'ch Zouw 't sjabloon kanne aapasse, zoeëdat me i maximaal twieë of drei wöad kan aageëve, wat d'raa mankeert. --Stephan (euverlègk) 22 mrt 2020 19:48 (CET)
Ha! :) Waat is de raeje des te dees bewirking höbs trögkgedrejdj? --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 19 apr 2020 12:28 (CEST)
- Doa han ich mich vergis, haha. :) --Stephan (euverlègk) 19 apr 2020 12:42 (CEST)
We sent you an e-mail
[brón bewèrke]Hello Stephan 0796,
Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.
You can see my explanation here.
MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 25 sep 2020 20:52 (CEST)
Moin, heste de Tied, ömdat de Artikel no Velberter Platt verschiewen koun?!? --MicBy67 (euverlègk) 6 jun 2022 21:33 (CEST)
- Hallo, sorry dat ich neet gereageerd han! Ich woar e paar daag neet aktief op Wikipedia, mar doe has 't artikel al versjove. 't Zuut trouwes good oet en v'r zint vroeë dat óch get uuever e Duutsj-Limburgs dialek gesjrieëve weëd! Compliment! :) --Zjweëgelke (euverlègk) 8 jun 2022 17:06 (CEST)
- :-D --MicBy67 (euverlègk) 10 jun 2022 16:22 (CEST)
Limbörgse Swadeshlies
[brón bewèrke]Daag Stephan, iech höb de aofgeloupe daog, veur de Ziewse Wiktionair-in-weuring, 'n Limbörgse Swadeshlies gemaak. Versjèllende dialekte zien drop trök te vinde, ouch 't Heerles. Jaomer genóg had iech neet vaan eder dialek 'nen dictionair bij de hand, en veur 't Heerles höb iech miech gooddeils mote behelpe mèt vastelaovesleedsjes. Die meneer vaan doen is natuurlek neet einwandfrei; daobij kós iech ouch neet alle 207 wäörd vinde. Zouws tiech de Heerlese kolom eve kinne naoloupe veur de leeg vekskes in te völle en eventueel foute droet te hole? Steinbach 🦇 (euverlègk) 15 apr 2023 23:50 (CEST)
- Zieëker! Wil ich waal doeë! :) --Zjweëgelke (euverlègk) 16 apr 2023 12:14 (CEST)
- Sjiek, daanke! Steinbach 🦇 (euverlègk) 16 apr 2023 14:40 (CEST)
Translation request
[brón bewèrke]Hi. Could you please translate this to Limburgs?
Lingua Franca Nova (“Elefen”) is a language designed to be particularly simple, consistent, and easy to learn for international communications. It has a number of positive qualities:
- 1. It has a limited number of phonemes. It sounds similar to Italian or Spanish.
- 2. It is phonetically spelled. No child should have to spend years learning irregularities.
- 3. It has a completely regular grammar, similar to the world’s creoles.
- 4. It has a limited and completely regular set of productive affixes for routine word derivation.
- 5. It has well-defined rules for word order, in keeping with many major languages.
- 6. Its vocabulary is strongly rooted in modern Romance languages. These languages are themselves widespread and influential, plus they have contributed the major part of English vocabulary
- 7. It is designed to be naturally accepting of Latin and Greek technical neologisms, the de facto “world standard”.
- 8. It is designed to seem relatively “natural” to those who are familiar with Romance languages, without being any more difficult for others to learn.
- We hope you like Elefen!
Thanks for your help. --Caro de Segeda (euverlègk) 31 mei 2023 09:05 (CEST)
Lekopeko70
[brón bewèrke]Daag Stephan, deze gebruker kin allezeleve gei Limbörgs. Heer gebruuk otomatische vertaoling, wie de tag al zeet. Iech wouw zjus goon veurstèlle tot v'r dit mer ins mote verbeeje, want veur 't Limbörgs lievert dit 'ne ganse doorein vaan dialekte op. Daobij kin AI noets good wèrke bij 'n taol mèt mer zoe wieneg sjrieftraditie. Daardes maak heer artikele aon die verdach väöl op promotie liekene - wat mote veer noe mèt zoe'n stök euver ein of aander dom drenkske? Dus iech hej in dien plaots nog eve gewach mèt 'welkom' zègke... Steinbach 🦇 (euverlègk) 3 fib 2024 12:14 (CET)
- Daag Steinbach, ierlig gezag twiefelde ich gisterovvend ooch. En vamörge, wie ich dat berichske sjreef, dach ich: "Bei twiefel toch get sjrieve en kieke of heë reageert." In de tekste zitte inderdaad erg vöal Hollesje wöad en ooch foute die me alling mit 'n automatische vertaling kins make. Ich houw 't egelig kinne wete. Sjtom va mich. --Zjweëgelke (euverlègk) 3 fib 2024 12:46 (CET)
- Ich zouw de pazjena uuever dat drenksjke inderdaad ooch verwiedere. Zal ich dan de anger twieë artikele ins good noalope? --Zjweëgelke (euverlègk) 3 fib 2024 12:56 (CET)
- Iech zouw niks detege höbbe veur ze alle drei eweg te goeje, meh este de aander twie wèls rèdde höbste natuurlek miene zege. Beter e (good) artikel mie es minder! Steinbach 🦇 (euverlègk) 3 fib 2024 13:54 (CET)